Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Research Workshop

Lecture

In a conversation, you are expected to observe certain etiquette: make eye contact, don't talk with your mouth full, don't interrupt, etc. These are some of the small ways we express consideration for others as we speak with them. In research, different etiquette is to be observed: you may not take someone else's words out of context; you may not deliberately misrepresent someone else's position; you must give credit to an author if you use his thoughts or words; etc. These are ways you maintain integrity and honesty as a scholar participating in the Great Conversation.

There are several considerations as you cite your sources:

1. Citing your sources makes it clear to your reader that you have done your research. It assures him that you have consulted others in the construction of your argument. Consider someone who comes up to you and tells you, "The Hobbit movies were the worst thing ever and Peter Jackson is a total moron." When pressed, all they can add is, "They were just super dumb." Consider also someone who tells you, "Based on Peter Jackson's previous films, his own interviews concerning The Hobbit movies, and the underlying assumptions both he and Tolkien make about Middle Earth, it is unfortunately clear that he has little or no concept of true nobility, and that lack of nobility translates into the films themselves." You may not agree with either person, but which of them has a position with which you can actually engage? Who has clearly thought through their position? Citing sources makes your own argument much more persuasive.

2. Citing your sources gives credit to those who deserve it. Failure to cite a source means that you are passing off someone else's work as your own, which is irresponsible at best and dishonest at worst. The other term for this is plagiarism, which is frowned upon everywhere but especially in the academic community. Incorrect or missing attribution is not only a lie but also inhibits the honest research of other scholars. Often (but not always), plagiarism is the result of mere sloppiness or ignorance; however, the consequences are usually severe--many colleges and universities (including NSA) will expel or suspend students who plagiarize.

3. Citing your sources allows other scholars to follow up on your research. If you cite someone in whom your reader is interested, your citation allows him to further his own research by finding the passage you mentioned. This is why citation guidelines are so strict: having set standards makes it easy for others to participate in the conversation. Clarity is important in order for people to follow the dialogue, and citation standards provide clarity.

What information are you obligated to cite?

 

  • Information that is not common knowledge. If it is something you knew before you started your research and/or something your readers could reasonably be expected to know without explanation, you do not need to cite it. However, if the information is original to some other thinker, you need to cite it. For example:
    • "King Alfred won the battle of Ethandune in May of 878 AD." This is merely a piece of historical data that is recorded in any history book on the subject, and does not need to be cited.
    • "King Alfred’s victory at Ethandune and the following baptism of Guthrum gave Alfred some moral sway over the warriors of the Danelaw." This is an original conclusion drawn from the fact of the battle, not “common knowledge,” and therefore must be cited.
  • Summary, Paraphrase, or Quotation. If you draw from someone else’s work in any of these ways, you must cite the author to give him credit.

What citation style should you use?

 

There are several citation styles that are each built for different disciplines. MLA, APA, and Chicago are three popular styles. Their main differences are usually in format--order of elements, punctuation, and so forth--and not in content. All styles expect you to include roughly the same information at roughly the same points in your paper.
 

NSA uses Chicago style (“Turabian”) standards. Turabian manuals are kept on reserve behind the desk for your reference, and there are several websites that will help you build a Chicago style citation. (Tip: If you use one of these sites, always double-check the end results; you are smarter than the machine.)

There are a few different ways to clearly give credit to the original author. You will often be expected to use all of these for each source, but not always.

In-text attribution

  • What is it? This is when you introduce the material and/or the author you are about to use within the narrative of your paper. For example:
    • "As Tolkien's character Samwise exclaims in The Return of the King, 'Is everything sad going to come untrue?'" Sam's question is the quotation from the source, but the introduction to it is yours and attributes the quotation to the author and the book.
  • When do you use it? Depending on the length and type of your assignment, you may not have to use this at all. For a short response paper, for instance, the author and work you are commenting on are assumed, so this attribution is not necessarily required. However, in a longer assignment, this kind of introduction is an easy way to show how a source relates to the point you are making, and keeps the reader oriented correctly to whose material is whose.
  • Note: Keep in mind that even if you have given this introduction to the source material, you are still required to footnote it and provide citation information.

Footnote

When do you use it? You are required to provide a footnote with citation information any time you have used a source in any way (summary, paraphrase, or direct quotation). You insert the footnote directly after the last sentence of your source material. This signals to the reader that the preceding work was not yours. In addition to the citation, you can often provide extra commentary or clarification in a footnote that would distract a reader from your main argument if it were included in your narrative.


Bibliography

When do you include a source in your bibliography?

  • If you created a footnote for the source, it must also be included in your bibliography.
  • If you used the source during the course of your research and it directly affected your argument or thoughts, it is a good idea to include it in your bibliography, even if you never cited it directly in your paper.

Exercise 7

YOUR HOMEWORK FOR THIS LESSON


1. Given the passage below, create the following:

  • An in-text introduction to the material and source attribution, as though you were including it in a paper
  • A footnote citation following Turabian/Chicago style
  • A bibliography entry following Turabian/Chicago style

2. Submit a PDF document containing #1 under the "Lesson 7" exercise on the Populi class page.


Passage:

"This first result rescues Augustine from being an oger in the history of the philosophy of language. But we must be cautious about jumping to the conclusion that he is a paragon."

This passage is from page 189 of "The Cambridge Companion to Augustine." All information necessary for citation can be found in the book itself, which has been placed on reserve behind the library desk for the entirety of Nicea Term.

NOTA BENE: Remember to pay close attention to the kind of resource this is. Is it just a normal book? A translation? An anthology? A specific edition?